1) The meaning of financial market efficiency
Financial market is a market for the exchange of capital and credit, which consists
the money markets and the capital markets. Money market is the market for short-term debt
securities, which is a typically safe and highly liquidable investment. While capital market
is the market where long-term debt or securities are traded.
Market efficiency refers to a condition, in which current prices reflect all the publicly
available information about a security. The basic idea underlying market efficiency is that
competition will drive all information into the price quickly.
In the financial market, the maximum price that investors are willing to pay for a financial
asset is actually the current value of future cash payments that discounted at a higher rate
to compensate us for the uncertainty in the cash flow projections. Therefore what investors are
trading actually information as a "commodity" in financial market for the future cash flows and
information about the degree of certainty.
Efficient market emerges when new information is quickly incorporated into the price so
that price becomes information. In other words the current market price reflects all available
information. Under these conditions the current market price in any financial market could be
the best-unbiased estimate of the value of the investment.
2.1) The theory relating to Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH)
The Efficient Market Hypothesis (EMH) has been consented as one of the cornerstones of
modern financial economics. Fama first defined the term "efficient market" in financial
literature in 1965 as one in which security prices fully reflect all available information.
The market is efficient if the reaction of market prices to new information should be instantaneous
and unbiased. Efficient market hypothesis is the idea that information is quickly and
efficiently incorporated into asset prices at any point in time, so that old information cannot be
used to foretell future price movements. Consequently, three versions of EMH are being distinguished
depends on the level of available information.
The weak form EMH stipulates that current asset prices already reflect past price and volume information.
The information contained in the past sequence of prices of a security is fully reflected in the current
market price of that security. It is named weak form because the security prices are the most publicly
and easily accessible pieces of information. It implies that no one should be able to outperform the
market using something that "everybody else knows". Yet, there are still numbers of financial researchers
who are studying the past stock price series and trading volume data in attempt to generate profit. This
technique is so called technical analysis that is asserted by EMH as useless for predicting future price
The semi strong form EMH states that all publicly available information is similarly already incorporated
into asset prices. In another word, all publicly available information is fully reflected in a security's
current market price. The public information stated not only past prices but also data reported in a
company's financial statements, company's announcement, economic factors and others. It also implies
that no one should be able to outperform the market using something that "everybody else knows". This
indicates that a company's financial statements are of no help in forecasting future price movements and
securing high investment returns.
The strong form EMH stipulates that private information or insider information too, is quickly incorporated
by market prices and therefore cannot be used to reap abnormal trading profits. Thus, all information,
whether public or private, is fully reflected in a security's current market price. That's mean, even
the company's management (insider) are not able to make gains from inside information they hold. They
are not able to take the advantages to profit from information such as take over decision which has
been made ten minutes ago. The rationale behind to support is that the market anticipates in an unbiased
manner, future development and therefore information has been incorporated and evaluated into market price
in much more objective and informative way than insiders.
The random walk model of asset prices is an extension of the EMH, as are the notions that the market cannot
be consistently beaten, arbitrage is impossible, and "free lunches" are generally unavailable.
2.2) The implications of the EMH for optimal investment strategies
The EMH has implied that no one can outperform the market either with security selection or with market
timing. Thus, it carries huge negative implications for many investment strategies. Generally, the impact
of EMH can be viewed from two different perspectives:
i) Investors perspective:
Technical analysis uses past patterns of price and the volume of trading as the basis for predicting
future prices. The random-walk evidence suggests that prices of securities are affected by news.
Favourable news will push up the price and vice versa. It is therefore appropriate to question the
value of technical analysis as a means of choosing security investments.
Fundamentals analysis involves using market information to determine the intrinsic value of securities
in order to identify those securities that are undervalued. However semi strong form market efficiency
suggests that fundamentals analysis cannot be used to outperform the market. In an efficient market, equity
research and valuation would be a costly task that provided no benefits. The odds of finding an undervalued
stock should be random (50/50). Most of the time, the benefits from information collection and equity research
would not cover the costs of doing the research.
For optimal investment strategies, investors are suggested should follow a passive investment strategy, which
makes no attempt to beat the market. Investors should not select securities randomly according to their risk
aversion or the tax positions. This dose not means that there is no portfolio management. In an efficient market,
it would be superior strategy to have a randomly diversifying across securities, carrying little or no information
cost and minimal execution costs in order to optimise the returns. There would be no value added by portfolio
managers and investment strategists. An inflexible buy-and-hold policy is not optimal for matching the investor's
desired risk level. In addition, the portfolio manager must choose a portfolio that is geared toward the time
horizon and risks profile of the investor.
ii) Financial managers perspective
Managers need to keep in mind that markets would under react or over react to information, the company's share
price will reflect the information about their announcements (information).
The historical share price record can be used as a measure of company performance and management bear
responsibility for it.
When share are under priced, managers should avoid issuing new shares. This will only worsen the situation.
In normal circumstances, market efficiency theory provides useful insight into price behaviour.
Generally, it can be concluded that investors should only expect a normal rate of return while company should expect to receive the fair value for the securities they issue.
3) Empirical Tests for the EMH
Two different local studies on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange (KLSE) have been chosen, which each of the studies test on the different form of efficiency of the KLSE.
The first study, "Weak Form Efficiency and Mean Reversion in the Malaysian Stock Market" conducted by Kok Kim Lian and Goh Kim Leng, addresses the issue of weak form market efficiency in the Malaysian case by examining the random walk behaviour of stock prices over the short run in the KLSE using the closing levels of the seven KLSE stock indices: Composite Index, Emas Index and the five sectorial indices. The tests employed are run tests, serial correlation test, Ljung-Box-Pierce Q test and the von Neumann's ratio test, which are based on returns of short horizons.
Kok and Goh used the daily, weekly and monthly closing levels of the seven KLSE stock indices over a period of 9 years, 1984 to 1992. Meanwhile, the results are given for the two equal sub periods 1984 - June 1988 and July 1988 - 1992 in order to determine the attributable of any significant result of the sub periods towards the whole period result and also to make comparisons.
Study on the long run random walk behaviour in the KLSE is also being given attention by the Kok and Goh as the phenomenon of short run random walk behaviour may not hold in the long run. This is because they may revert to some mean level over longer horizons and is thereby said to be mean reverting. The study is done by investigating whether indices exhibit mean reversion.
In the run test to confirm the efficiency, which compared the actual number of runs with the expected in order to determine the dependence in price changes, no conclusion can be made by Kok and Goh as the results are in contrast among daily, weekly and monthly data.
In the statistical tests for independence, serial correlation, Ljung-Box-Pierce Q test and von Neumann's ratio test are being adopted. The results of serial correlation test on daily, weekly and monthly data are doubled confirmed by the Ljung-Box-Pierce Q tests, which can tests up to 12 lags. The results are being reinforced again with the Von Neumann's ratio test. The results of the various statistical tests on the KLSE daily stock indices indicate serial dependence in successive price changes. All the tests show that the Malaysian stock market has improved its efficiency from a weak form inefficient market in the mid 1980's to a weak form efficient market by the late 1980's and early 1990's.
Another study being chosen is "A Test of Semi-Strong Form Efficiency on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. The Effect of Annual Earnings and Dividend Announcements on Stock Prices" by Annuar Md Nasir and Shamsher Mohamad. This study as the title say it, is concerned with semi strong efficiency of listed stock on KLSE with adjustments for thin trading mis-estimates: the effect of information content of changes in annual earnings and dividend announcements on share prices is analysed.
Annuar and Shamsher used the monthly closing prices of all stocks traded during January 1975 to December 1989 with adjustments on any capitalisation changes. Earnings and dividend were collected from a sample size.
Annuar and Shamsher have employed event studies in the effort to show markets react quickly to new information. In the process to analyse the effects of annual earnings on stock prices, market model was used to generate expected returns with the consideration of market wide factors as well as the systematic risk of individual stock. Annuar and Shamsher also adopted the use of equally-weighted market return with supporting evidence for the method. Thus, the stock's abnormal return is derived from the differences between actual and expected returns.
The average abnormal returns and cumulative abnormal returns for 12 months are then taken as measures of average and cumulative impacts of earnings and dividend announcements, with the expectation that the cumulative abnormal returns would fluctuate randomly around zero after the announcement. In conjunction, Annuar and Shamsher estimated 2.7 percent of risk-adjusted abnormal returns net of costs are not achievable by investors.
In addition, Annuar and Shamsher have employed moving window technique for re-estimating risk in order to mitigate the possibility of a shift in the risk of the stock as a result of the announcements. Besides that, the Dimson-Fowler-Rorke (DFR) method was employed to correct the thin-trading bias by applying a two lead and two lag specifications.
Finally, Annuar and Shamsher used the Wilcoxon signed-ranked test to analyse for possible significant differences in the monthly abnormal returns for bath earnings and dividend changes, with 5 percent of significant level to accept the semi strong efficiency theory.
Another additional methodology need to be highlighted here is that Annuar and Shamsher have actually differentiated the samples of securities to two categories based on their traded volume.
Please take note that, for both studies, we are not looking in-depth into the statistical tests formula which have been employed in order to maintain the length of this article. Besides that, we feel that the collection of data, adjustment to data and the selection on which statistical tests to be used is more important than the formula. This is because the formula is "death" and is in the standard form for all researchers around the world unless the researcher made modification to the formula. However, both of the studies are enclosed in the appendices for references.
4) Assessment of the extent to which financial markets are efficient in the light of relevant empirical studies
The two studies being discussed have actually come to the same conclusion that accept or in line with the underlying theory of each form of efficiency. In order to assess which financial markets are more efficient according to the studies, we may need to look in-depth to the methodology and basis for accept or reject for each studies.
In the first study on weak form efficiency, the researchers have strong evidence to prove their conclusion as 4 statistical tests are being used to reinforce the result. However, with only statistical tests are being employed can be a major drawback as the trading rule tests are being over looked such as the filter rules may beat the market. Moreover, the data used are not adjusted to any capitalisation changes which may bring huge impact to the result of the findings.
In the second study on semi strong form efficiency, the researchers have test on two events, namely the effect of annual earnings and dividend announcements on stock prices. The two events studies chosen are appropriate according to the local environment where most local investors concern about although there is more other events that can be look into. Besides that, it is a good approach that the researchers have made adjustments on capitalisation changes on the stock prices since this may differ the findings. The idea of categories the stock according to the volume traded is seen to be able to identify the monopoly problem of certain higher traded stock because the market can be efficient if only a fraction of the stock traded.
From the both studies, we noticed that no initiative has been taken to forecast for the expectational errors. No tests is free from error, users of the research need to know the degree of error in order to rely on the findings of the research. However, we have reached to the final conclusion that the second study on semi strong form show that the financial market under research is more efficient.
Alan, M.S., "Predicting Abnormal Stock Returns with a Nonparametric Nonlinear Method",
http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~chapados/IJCNN2001/Proceedings/pdffiles/papers/409.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2001)
Annuar, M.N., and Shamsher, M., (1993) The Efficiency of Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange, Pernerbit Universiti Pertanian Malaysia.
Bernama, (2001)"Keat Seng: Investors Should Take Longer Term View of KLSE", Bernama, Malaysia, 13 September.
Bernama, (2001)"KLSE's Salleh Concurs with PM on the Need for Long-Term Investing Strategy", Bernama, Malaysia, 3 September.
"Capital Market Efficiency",
http://management.canberra.edu.au/lectures/accounting/sem981/unit4839/Chapter_17_Capital_Market_Efficiency.txt (accessed on 10 November 2001)
Elroy, D., and Massoud, M., "Market Efficiency",
http://www.london.edu/faculty/edimson/spellbou.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2001)
Fama, E. F., (1970) "Efficient Capital Markets: A Review of Theory and Empirical Work," Journal of Finance, 25:2, 383-417.
John, B.W., and Morgan P.M., "Last Year's Winners as This Year's Picks: An Analysis of Recent Hindsight as a Mutual Fund Trading Rules?"
http://tmag.com/jfsd/pdffiles/v12n1/white.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2001)
Jonathan, C., Tomas, J., and Gershon M., "The Efficient Markets Hypothesis",
http://comp.uark.edu/~tjandik/papers/emh.pdf (accessed on 10 November 2001)
Kok, K.L., and Goh, K.L., (1995): Malaysian Securities Market, Selangor, Pelanduk Publications,
Leo, K.C., and Kendall, J.D., "An Empirical Analysis of Stock Indices in Three Southeast Asian Countries",
http://www.ntu.edu.sg/nbs/publications/regional_issues_in_economics/05lkc96.pdf(accessed on 10 November 2001)
Mark, N.K.S., Philip, L., and Adrian, T., (2000) Research Method for Business Students, (2nd edn), England, Pearson Education Limited, Chapter 13.
Richard, P., and Bill, N., (1999) Corporate Finance and Investment Decision and Strategies, (3rd edn), England, Pearson Education Limited, Chapter 2.
Robert, G.B., and John, B., "The Efficient Market Hypothesis- A Discussion of Institutional, Agency and Behavioural Issues",
http://www.financeprofessor.com/488/notes/emh2.doc (accessed on 10 November 2001)
Tan, T.H., (2001) "Capitalising on Market Inefficiencies", Smart Investor, August, p. 8.
Yong, O., (1994) Making Money In the Stock Exchange, Selangor, Pelanduk Publications, Chapter 3-5.
Yong, O., (1999) How to Make Money From the Malaysian Stock Exchange, Kuala Lumpur, Leeds Publications, Chapter 3, 6, 7-10, 15.